On the Education of Women
by Daniel Defoe
I
have often thought of it as one of the most barbarous customs in the world,
considering us as a civilized and a Christian country, that we deny the
advantages of learning to women. We reproach the sex every day with folly and
impertinence; while I am confident, had they the advantages of education equal
to us, they would be guilty of less than ourselves. One would wonder, indeed,
how it should happen that women are conversible at all; since they are only
beholden to natural parts, for all their knowledge. Their youth is spent to teach
them to stitch and sew or make baubles. They are taught to read, indeed, and
perhaps to write their names, or so; and that is the height of a woman's
education. And I would but ask any who slight the sex for their understanding,
what is a man (a gentleman, I mean) good for, that is taught no more? I need
not give instances, or examine the character of a gentleman, with a good
estate, or a good family, and with tolerable parts; and examine what figure he
makes for want of education. The soul is placed in the body like a rough
diamond; and must be polished, or the lustre of it will never appear. And 'tis
manifest, that as the rational soul distinguishes us from brutes; so education
carries on the distinction, and makes some less brutish than others. This is too
evident to need any demonstration. But why then should women be denied the
benefit of instruction? If knowledge and understanding had been useless
additions to the sex, God Almighty would never have given them capacities; for
he made nothing needless. Besides, I would ask such, What they can see in
ignorance, that they should think it a necessary ornament to a woman? or how
much worse is a wise woman than a fool? or what has the woman done to forfeit
the privilege of being taught? Does she plague us with her pride and
impertinence? Why did we not let her learn, that she might have had more wit?
Shall we upbraid women with folly, when 'tis only the error of this inhuman
custom, that hindered them from being made wiser? The capacities of women are
supposed to be greater, and their senses quicker than those of the men; and
what they might be capable of being bred to, is plain from some instances of
female wit, which this age is not without. Which upbraids us with Injustice,
and looks as if we denied women the advantages of education, for fear they
should vie with the men in their improvements.... [They] should be taught all
sorts of breeding suitable both to their genius and quality. And in particular,
Music and Dancing; which it would be cruelty to bar the sex of, because they
are their darlings. But besides this, they should be taught languages, as
particularly French and Italian: and I would venture the injury of giving a
woman more tongues than one. They should, as a particular study, be taught all
the graces of speech, and all the necessary air of conversation; which our
common education is so defective in, that I need not expose it. They should be
brought to read books, and especially history; and so to read as to make them
understand the world, and be able to know and judge of things when they hear of
them. To such whose genius would lead them to it, I would deny no sort of
learning; but the chief thing, in general, is to cultivate the understandings
of the sex, that they may be capable of all sorts of conversation; that their
parts and judgements being improved, they may be as profitable in their
conversation as they are pleasant. Women, in my observation, have little or no
difference in them, but as they are or are not distinguished by education.
Tempers, indeed, may in some degree influence them, but the main distinguishing
part is their Breeding. The whole sex are generally quick and sharp. I believe,
I may be allowed to say, generally so: for you rarely see them lumpish and
heavy, when they are children; as boys will often be. If a woman be well bred,
and taught the proper management of her natural wit, she proves generally very
sensible and retentive. And, without partiality, a woman of sense and manners
is the finest and most delicate part of God's Creation, the glory of Her Maker,
and the great instance of His singular regard to man, His darling creature: to
whom He gave the best gift either God could bestow or man receive. And 'tis the
sordidest piece of folly and ingratitude in the world, to withhold from the sex
the due lustre which the advantages of education gives to the natural beauty of
their minds. A woman well bred and well taught, furnished with the additional
accomplishments of knowledge and behaviour, is a creature without comparison.
Her society is the emblem of sublimer enjoyments, her person is angelic, and
her conversation heavenly. She is all softness and sweetness, peace, love, wit,
and delight. She is every way suitable to the sublimest wish, and the man that
has such a one to his portion, has nothing to do but to rejoice in her, and be
thankful. On the other hand, Suppose her to be the very same woman, and rob her
of the benefit of education, and it follows - If her temper be good, want of
education makes her soft and easy. Her wit, for want of teaching, makes her
impertinent and talkative. Her knowledge, for want of judgement and experience,
makes her fanciful and whimsical. If her temper be bad, want of breeding makes
her worse; and she grows haughty, insolent, and loud. If she be passionate,
want of manners makes her a termagant and a scold, which is much at one with
Lunatic. If she be proud, want of discretion (which still is breeding) makes
her conceited, fantastic, and ridiculous. And from these she degenerates to be
turbulent, clamorous, noisy, nasty, the devil!... The great distinguishing
difference, which is seen in the world between men and women, is in their
education; and this is manifested by comparing it with the difference between
one man or woman, and another. And herein it is that I take upon me to make
such a bold assertion, That all the world are mistaken in their practice about
women. For I cannot think that God Almighty ever made them so delicate, so
glorious creatures; and furnished them with such charms, so agreeable and so
delightful to mankind; with souls capable of the same accomplishments with men:
and all, to be only Stewards of our Houses, Cooks, and Slaves. Not that I am
for exalting the female government in the least: but, in short, I would have
men take women for companions, and educate them to be fit for it. A woman of
sense and breeding will scorn as much to encroach upon the prerogative of man,
as a man of sense will scorn to oppress the weakness of the woman. But if the
women's souls were refined and improved by teaching, that word would be lost.
To say, the weakness of the sex, as to judgment, would be nonsense; for
ignorance and folly would be no more to be found among women than men. I
remember a passage, which I heard from a very fine woman. She had wit and
capacity enough, an extraordinary shape and face, and a great fortune: but had
been cloistered up all her time; and for fear of being stolen, had not had the
liberty of being taught the common necessary knowledge of women's affairs. And
when she came to converse in the world, her natural wit made her so sensible of
the want of education, that she gave this short reflection on herself: "I
am ashamed to talk with my very maids," says she, "for I don't know
when they do right or wrong. I had more need go to school, than be
married." I need not enlarge on the loss the defect of education is to the
sex; nor argue the benefit of the contrary practice. 'Tis a thing will be more
easily granted than remedied. This chapter is but an Essay at the thing: and I
refer the Practice to those Happy Days (if ever they shall be) when men shall
be wise enough to mend it.
