‘Reagan: The Life,’ by H.
W. Brands
By JEFF SHESOLJUNE 1, 2015
Sunday Book Review|‘Reagan: The Life,’ by H. W. Brands
For a man who lived most of
his life on camera, Ronald Reagan eludes focus. There was, and remains, a
gauziness to the picture; Reagan retained, throughout his political career, the
remoteness of a screen idol, though he never achieved that status as a movie
actor. He was ubiquitous for decades and, as president, left a lasting imprint
on America’s political culture. Yet he was all the same an unknowable man —
even to those nearest him. In White House meetings, he was mostly silent, often
leaving his aides to guess at (and feud over) his views. In his personal
relationships, he was unfailingly warm but rarely intimate. “He doesn’t let
anybody get too close,” one observer said. “There’s a wall around him.” That
the observer was his wife, Nancy, should give pause to any politician or pundit
who claims to know what Reagan would do if he were here today. (It should, but
it won’t.)
It should also serve as a
warning to any biographer. A two-volume treatment by Lou Cannon, who covered
Reagan as a reporter for more than three decades, arguably got close to the
real Reagan. But that was a rare achievement. The example of Edmund Morris
provides a cautionary tale: In the mid-1980s, having won the Pulitzer Prize, he
signed on to write an authorized biography of Reagan and was given
extraordinary access to the man and his papers. Yet Morris found his subject so
confounding that — in a spectacularly misguided attempt to understand and
explain Reagan — he rendered himself a fictional character, worked his way into
Reagan’s life story and called the resulting book, “Dutch,” “an advance in
biographical honesty.” Once described as “America’s Boswell,” Morris ended up
as Reagan’s Ahab — driven mad by his mission to “strike through the mask,” as
Melville’s accursed captain put it.
Few authors since have
dared reckon with Reagan’s life in full. And where biographers fear to tread,
monographers run wild and free, publishing shorter takes on narrower topics.
The Reagan canon contains books on his spirituality, his character and his dream
of a world free of nuclear weapons; books on his successful run for governor of
California in 1966, his failed campaign for the Republican nomination in 1976
and his election as president in 1980; and books on his love letters to Nancy
and his relationships with Speaker of the House Thomas P. (Tip) O’Neill and
Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher. Taken together, these books constitute a
blind-men-and-the-elephant approach to reconstructing Reagan. Even if one were
to read them all, Reagan’s own question — a line from one of his films, “King’s
Row” — would remain: “Where’s the rest of me?”
The answer might seem
likely to be found somewhere in “Reagan: The Life,” the first substantial
biography of the 40th president in the decade and a half since “Dutch.” Undaunted
by Morris’s misadventure, the historian H. W. Brands does not break a sweat in
his brisk, if extended, stroll through Reagan’s long life. Brands is at ease in
the company of a colossus; in “Reagan,” as in his popular biographies of Andrew
Jackson, Franklin Roosevelt and other great men, he breezes through and around
complexities without pause or digression. His portrait of Reagan is fair-minded
if fond; “Reagan” is free of the partisan ax-grinding and mostly free of the
mythmaking that characterizes much of the Reagan bookshelf. Brands makes clear
that Reagan was, in many ways, a paradox: an “ideologist” who was open to
compromise, even on taxes and federal spending; a reflexive optimist with a
wide streak of “negativity”; a staunch anti-Communist whose policies toward the
“evil empire” were, as Brands notes, mostly cautious, “pragmatic” and
“nonjudgmental.”
Like his subject, Brands
appears happiest when he’s telling a story, and Reagan, of course, provides
many excellent ones — from his good humor in the emergency room after being
shot by John Hinckley in 1981 to his two-day-long negotiation with the Soviet
leader Mikhail Gorbachev in Reykjavik, Iceland, in 1986, the prelude to a
historic arms reduction agreement the following year. Few of these stories,
though, are unfamiliar. “Reagan” is a greatest hits collection that is light on
new material. Considered against other biographies in its weight class — those
mega-books to which the word “definitive” adheres as if by laws of physics —
Brands’s account is peculiarly unambitious, overfull of pat and timeworn
observations. On Reagan’s enduring appeal, he writes that “Reagan loved the
camera, and the camera loved him. The affair would last a lifetime.” On the
political power of Reagan’s jokes and anecdotes, he notes that “democratic
elections are, at their most basic level, popularity contests, and Reagan knew
how to be popular.” It is counterintuitive to call an 800-page book
superficial, but length does not equal depth.
Brands, who holds an
endowed chair in history at the University of Texas at Austin, shows a
surprising indifference to the literature on his subject. Aside from marquee
memoirs by Michael Deaver, Donald Regan, George Shultz and other members of the
Reagan staff and cabinet, Brands draws on very few books at all, and apparently
even fewer primary documents — typically the biographer’s manna. This despite
the government’s rolling declassification of millions of pages of memos, notes
and correspondence from the Reagan years. The chapter on Reagan’s February 1981
address to Congress, in which he set out his economic agenda, cites only a
single source: the text of the speech. An account of Reagan’s six-day visit to
China in 1984 relies almost exclusively on Reagan’s own diary.
“The most important source
of information on Ronald Reagan,” Brands observes in a note on sources, “is
Reagan himself.” It’s true that Reagan, the former actor, did an impressive
amount of his own scripting as a politician, writing not only speeches and
letters but also policy essays and radio addresses. Reagan’s diaries can be
refreshingly frank. Brands quotes a June 14, 1982, entry in which Reagan admits
to sharing his advisers’ irritation with Al Haig, his contentious secretary of
state: “It’s amazing how sound he can be on complex international matters,”
Reagan writes, “but how utterly paranoid with regard to the people he must work
with.” Often, though, Brands simply steps back and allows Reagan — who
frequently conflated fact and fiction, and had trouble distinguishing movie
plots from reality — to function as his own narrator. At times, Brands casts
doubt on Reagan’s version of events, but usually he lets Reagan speak for
himself, unchecked and unchallenged.
“Reagan” is, in the end, a
missed opportunity — a disappointingly thin and strangely inert portrait of a
president who, given his hold on the conservative imagination, still needs to
be better understood. His admirers have worked so assiduously for so long to
promote a particular notion of Reagan — the tax-cutting, government-loathing
Reagan, the line-in-the-sand Reagan who was unafraid to rattle a saber or call
an empire “evil” — that over time it has become harder, not easier, to
apprehend the essential Reagan, contradictions and all. The appropriation of
Reagan’s image by those who reject and deny his political pragmatism requires
in response a sharper, clearer, fuller portrait than Brands provides. The rest
of Reagan might never be knowable, but the search is important, and ought to go
on.
REAGAN
The Life
By H. W. Brands
Illustrated. 805 pp.
Doubleday. $35.
Jeff Shesol is the author, most recently, of “Supreme Power: Franklin
Roosevelt vs. the Supreme Court.”
A version of this review appears in print on June 7, 2015, on page BR14
of the Sunday Book Review with the headline: The Unknowable Man.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/07/books/review/reagan-the-life-by-h-w-brands.html
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário