terça-feira, 30 de abril de 2013
segunda-feira, 29 de abril de 2013
domingo, 28 de abril de 2013
por trinta dinheiros francisco vaz brasil
por trinta dinheiros
francisco vaz brasil
e a
mãe declarou:
“estou sem braços
sem pernas,
sem cabeça, sem nada...
levaram tudo de mim.”
o pai
e a irmã, mudos, paralisados
- estupefatos, desfeitos sobre o sofá
este é
um quadro tétrico
pintado
em uma casa
em
são bernardo do campo – são paulo;
e, na parte da frente da casa,
funciona o consultório
funciona o consultório
de uma
dentista, 47,
que atendia a uma cliente
e foi surpreendida por quatro facínoras
que atendia a uma cliente
e foi surpreendida por quatro facínoras
e obrigada a entregar seu cartão bancário
aos bandidos...
dois
foram ao banco;
e dois ficaram ameaçando as vítimas;
lá,
na conta, disponíveis,
apenas trinta dinheiros...
e
eles voltaram,
com o diabo no couro, enlouquecidos
e, em represália, os fedepês...
e, em represália, os fedepês...
jogaram
a dentista no sofá
e a
incendiaram com álcool,
sem
dó, nem piedade...
- covardes, cachorros, monstros!!!
e, se
foram
com
os trinta dinheiros...
sem
serem incomodados
- a
dentista era...
arrimo
de família...
tristeza,
revolta
e, muitos porquês
invadem
o peito
dos
brasileiros...
e a
segurança?
e a
segurança?
- que segurança?
- que segurança?
a constituição
revogou
o
direito à vida!
- toda
a propriedade
doravante
poderá ser invadida;
os
bens e a vida dos seres
poderão
ser retirados,
sem
prévio aviso,
preferencialmente,
por
bandidos, ladrões e assassinos cruéis!
sem direito
à segurança,
consultórios,
pequenas lojas e quiosques,
se
quiserem continuar atuando,
terão
que contratar sua segurança
-
porque o estado é inapto, inerme
incompetente,
corrupto e alienado
e até
seu superior tribunal federal
não
terá mais poderes (será Dr. Teori?)
que
conste nos autos que:
- condeno
o estado de São Paulo
a pagar
pensão vitalícia à família
da
dentista assassinada,
com a
devida assistência médico-social.
está na hora
de os governantes
e políticos, donos de trustes e cartéis,
tomarem vergonha na cara.
Afinal recebem uma fortuna
para apenas ficarem brincando
de ir às plenárias e falarem um monte
de merda ao povo que os elegeu!
Dê-se
ciência e Cumpra-se!
sábado, 27 de abril de 2013
Tribeca Diary: 'The Kill Team' by Joel Arnold
Tribeca Diary: 'The Kill Team'
by Joel Arnold
April 24,
2013
Writer Joel Arnold is
surveying the scene at the Tribeca Film Festival, which runs in New York City
through April 28. He'll be filing occasional dispatches for Monkey See.
At Tribeca over the weekend, I was initially
reluctant to seek out The Kill Team, a documentary focused on American
soldiers charged in the 2010 murders of three Afghan civilians — this, after a
week when senseless violence felt especially close to home.
I was eventually persuaded to see it, though,
because it posed a question about someone trying to do good when he became
witness to such violence: How could a military whistle-blower morally right
enough to report the murder of innocents also be wrong enough to be charged
with the same crimes?
The Kill Team
- Director: Dan Krauss
- Genre: Documentary
- Running Time: 79 minutes
Not rated; violent images,
intense scenes and language
It's not the only question, or even the most
relevant one, when civilians die in cold blood, but it's the question that
drives this uneasy and essential exploration of mission drift, dehumanization
and abdicated responsibility.
Spc. Adam Winfield is the film's primary
subject, a skinny kid from Florida with a big heart and dreams — since he was
young — of following his dad's example and joining the Army. That's one version
of Adam, anyway, but one that appears only in photographs and in the tearful
accounts of Adam's parents, Emma and Christopher.
Facing military trial for his actions in May
2010 and charged with the premeditated murder of Mullah Adahdad, an unarmed
Afghan, the Adam onscreen is consumed with anxiety, his face grayed from
sleepless nights. He flatly admits to his depression, and if he had his way he
might barely defend the charge. But where Adam is defeated, his parents are outraged,
and a palpable sense of injustice pervades Adam's pretrial meetings. He
wouldn't be there if someone had listened to him months earlier.
Privileged with access to the other soldiers
in Adam's unit, director Dan Krauss conveys the anxious mindset of the newly
deployed in their own words. Video taken in Kandahar during Adam's deployment
shows them waiting around, talking about being bored, and going out on patrol
hoping for something to happen. Nothing much would, until they'd be attacked
and someone would be injured. Then it would all be over, and they'd be back to
waiting for an attack.
It just didn't live up to the hype, as one
specialist says.
That changed when their squad leader was hit
by an IED, and Staff Sgt. Calvin Gibbs took over. In January 2010, Christopher
received panicked communications from his son that things had gone wrong. Over
Facebook chat, Adam said they were murdering people. Gibbs, the new squad
leader, had introduced the unit to ways of getting kills — like planting found
weapons on the unarmed — and Adam's fellow soldiers, Andrew Holmes and Jeremy
Morlock, had put the tactics into practice.
In describing their kills, Morlock and Holmes
are less emotional, even willing to justify their actions. If Morlock's
detached description of how he staged the murder of 15-year-old Gul Mudin
doesn't disturb viewers, the photos they took of the body will.
Krauss captures Adam's isolation and his
parents' powerlessness in being able to help their son. In one harrowing scene,
Christopher wonders if he could have done more — he called agency after office
to report the incident, and he was ignored or told there was nothing that could
be done.
Then there's Emma, who wonders when Adam is
offered a plea deal of eight years what his options were — try to hold out, or
speak up, and to whom? Over months, Gibbs found more willing participants
interested in getting a kill. When it was clear Adam wasn't one of them, Gibbs
threatened him directly.
It might be his word against his commander's
and that of the 30 other soldiers. It might be his life. On that crucial day on
patrol with Morlock and Gibbs, when the two encountered Mullah Adahdad and
decided to get another kill, Adam says, he fired his gun away from the victim.
But he didn't stop his colleagues.
For their parts, Morlock and Holmes aren't on
camera to exonerate Adam. They voice feeling abandoned by a system that had
trained them to kill and punished them when they did. Even Spc. Justin Stoner,
whose report of an assault by Gibbs' cadre led to the investigation that outed
the unit, says he wished he hadn't snitched — the men were doing what they were
trained to do.
There are many parts of The Kill Team
that provoke outrage, and the film doesn't try to simplify the issue or assign
the kind of blame that might assure viewers these atrocities were the actions
of a few isolated individuals and not a foreseeable result of a systemic
problem.
The narrow focus on Adam's trial, though,
means Kill Team ultimately doesn't try to deliver a wider critique,
letting the most unsettling idea in the film be expressed implicitly: If it's
this simple for soldiers to go off-mission and perpetrate crimes without
notice, could it be happening elsewhere? The answer is probably yes.
http://www.npr.org/blogs/monkeysee/2013/04/24/178659101/tribeca-diary-the-kill-team?ft=3&f=1045&sc=nl&cc=movn-20130426
In 'Paradise,' Pursuing Something Less Than Love by Mark Jenkins
In
'Paradise,' Pursuing Something Less Than Love
by Mark Jenkins
April 25,
2013
The opening sequence of Paradise: Love doesn't really have
anything to do with what follows, but it does establish director Ulrich Seidl's
unflinching eye. At a pavilion somewhere in Austria, a group of cognitively
challenged children, many apparently with Down syndrome, ride bumper cars under
the supervision of Teresa (Margarethe Tiesel). There's no hint of
sentimentality, no attempt at reassurance.
In fact Teresa, a corpulent middle-aged divorcee with
a surly teenage daughter, clearly needs a vacation — and the Alps or the Baltic
won't do. After a consult with a hedonistic pal, Inge (Inge Maux), Teresa heads
for a Kenyan resort to enjoy the attentions of the well-built young men who
line up just beyond the ropes claiming most of the hotel's beach for paying
guests only.
Co-written by Seidl and his regular collaborator
Veronika Franz, Paradise:
Love is startlingly frank if narratively underdeveloped. It picks
up the theme of the filmmaker's 2007 Import/Export,
in which characters cross between East and West — specifically between Austria
and Ukraine — in search of work. This time, he observes a North-South
transaction, with only one side in it for the money.
The tourists don't exactly hire the locals, yet the
subject of cash soon arises, sometimes subtly but often not. As in Heading South, French
director Laurent Cantet's 2005 film on the same subject, older women use their
financial power to replace faded sexual allure. The men rely on physical beauty
— and don't necessarily bother to be charming.
While the women are more interested in niceties, they
can be condescending and even racist. Before hitting the beach, Teresa and a
friend cackle while insisting that a bartender parrot the German names of
foodstuffs whose shininess reminds them of his skin.
Then it's time for more carnal pursuits. The first
gigolo Teresa encounters is too abrupt, and she flees. She's happier with the
dreadlocked Munga (nonprofessional actor Peter Kuzungu), who's gentler and
never asks for anything for himself. (He does, it will transpire, have an
intriguingly large number of relatives who need urgent medical care.)
It might seem that, once she becomes disillusioned
with Munga, Teresa would have had enough of the hustle. But she keeps pursuing
her notion of a holiday romance until a raunchy scene with a male stripper —
echoing one with a female prostitute in Import/Export
— reveals the hopelessness of her quest.
Teresa's doggedness parallels the movie's own. Paradise: Love would
be more compelling if it had a second act in which either its protagonist or
one of her boy toys came to some sort of realization. Instead, Seidl's strategy
is to reiterate and escalate, which is finally more exhausting than
illuminating. If nothing else, the film's second half proves Tiesel's daring and
dedication as an actor.
The director has a background in documentary, where he
developed instincts that serve him well. Strikingly photographed by Wolfgang
Thaler and Ed Lachman, who also shot Import/Export,
the movie includes some striking real-world sequences. When Teresa and her
giggly friends go to watch crocodiles at feeding time, it's a metaphor for
voraciousness that also works as sheer exotic spectacle.
Partially improvised, Paradise: Love began as movie about three
female relatives on separate (and disparate) vacations. It snowballed into a
trilogy, with the forthcoming Paradise:
Faith (about a missionary) and Paradise:
Hope (about a diet camp) as separate films.
Perhaps those installments will be shapelier, with
stronger resolutions to their premises. But it's unlikely that they'll be more
audacious than this exploration of European sex tourism.
http://www.npr.org/2013/04/25/178449326/in-paradise-pursuing-something-less-than-love?ft=3&f=1045&sc=nl&cc=movn-20130426
Pain & Gain: Michael Bay's Suffering Fools by Scoyy Tobias
Pain & Gain:
Michael Bay's Suffering Fools
by Scoyy Tobias
April 25,
2013
For Michael Bay, the
director of Armageddon and the Transformers movies, to comment on
the excesses of American culture would be a little like — well, Michael Bay
commenting on the excesses of American culture.
And yet that's exactly what
he does with Pain & Gain, a stranger-than-fiction yarn about a South
Florida crime spree that points and snickers in the direction of precisely the
supersized grotesquerie that's long been Bay's stock-in-trade. He blankets the
film in a tone of smug self-awareness that obscures everything but its bald
hypocrisy.
A modest little comedy by
Bay's standards — and an unwieldy behemoth by any other's — Pain & Gain
gets some early comic mileage out of the get-rich-quick aspirations of a
musclehead who believes he's entitled to a big, steroidal hunk of the American
dream. This would be Mark Wahlberg, channeling the dim naivete he brought to
his starry-eyed young porn star in Boogie Nights, as Daniel Lugo, a
pumped-up Miami gym trainer who wants more from life than a crummy apartment
and a used Fiero. His job brings him close to the vanilla-scented elite, but
only close enough for a seductive whiff before the next monied client walks
through the door.
Inspired by a motivational
speaker (Ken Jeong) who talks of "doers" and "don't-ers"
before skipping the next yacht out of town, Daniel sees an angle when a client,
sandwich-shop magnate Victor Kershaw (Tony Shalhoub), brags about the millions
he has stuffed in offshore bank accounts.
Daniel recruits two other
gym rats — born-again cocaine fiend Paul Doyle (Dwayne Johnson) and phallically
challenged 'roid-abuser Adrian Doorbal (Anthony Mackie) — as partners for a crude
smash-and-grab job. All the three have to do is kidnap and sedate Kershaw, get
him to sign over his lucrative accounts and release him like a fleeced sheep.
Things do not, you'll be
startled to hear, go as planned — mainly because the planners lack the
collective brainpower to knock over a lemonade stand. They survive (and thrive)
for as long as they do only through brute force and moral vacancy, a potent
combination for criminal mischief-makers. But the three men are incapable of
long-term strategizing, which seems right for drug-enhanced muscleheads: They
can grasp the immediate gains of bigger bodies and available women, but can't
visualize a future that will inevitably turn them into Mickey Rourke in The
Wrestler.
Working from Pete Collins'
true-crime book, Christopher Markus and Stephen McFeely's screenplay uses the
multinarrator effect of films like Martin Scorsese's Casino to get
inside the conspirators' empty heads while Bay's camera lays out their
music-video dreams.
When Pain & Gain's caper
is still in the planning stages, Wahlberg's excited monologues about America —
a country that started with "13 scrawny colonies" before becoming the
beefed-up juggernaut it remains today — can be a gas. The actor has a talent,
after all, for investing even rogues like Daniel with a childlike innocence
that's oddly winning.
But as the film grinds
along, Bay's exhausting supply of macho consumerist images — from the fleets of
Lamborghinis to the low-angle buffet of South Beach hard bodies — undercut the
film's attempts at social commentary. He's the last person in Hollywood who has
any business decrying the consequences of a culture that encourages taking
shortcuts and living large. It's impossible to leave the film believing that Daniel's
intentions were corrupt; with Bay telling the story, it's just his
execution that was lacking.
This is Bay's attempt to
make Fargo, but without the moral ballast of Frances McDormand's
pregnant cop around to personify the virtues of a simple, decent,
well-proportioned life. The bodies pile up — and for what, the film asks, just
as McDormand does in the back of a cruiser when the case has come to a bloody
end. "For what?" is a rhetorical question in Fargo. In Pain
& Gain, the wages of murder and sin have a luxurious appeal that even
Daniel's downfall can't diminish.
http://www.npr.org/2013/04/25/178449564/pain-gain-michael-bays-suffering-fools?ft=3&f=1045&sc=nl&cc=movn-20130426
Assinar:
Postagens (Atom)