THE BOOK OF DEAD
PHILOSOPHERS,
By Simon Critchley
Ilustrated. 265 pages.
Vintage Books. $15.95.
January 30, 2009
Books of The Times
Dying and Death: When You Sort It Out, What’s It All About, Diogenes?
A review by Dinitia Smith
Heraclitus,
who believed that everything was in a state of flux, died, according to one
account, of drowning in cow dung. The philosopher Francis Bacon, that great
champion of the empirical method, died of his own philosophy: in an effort to
observe the effects of refrigeration, on a freezing cold day he stuffed a
chicken with snow and caught pneumonia.
As
a philosopher dies, so he has lived and believed. And from the manner of his
dying we can understand his thinking, or so the philosopher Simon Critchley
seems to be saying in his cheekily titled “Book of Dead Philosophers.”
Mr.
Critchley has taken as his thesis Cicero’s axiom “To philosophize is to learn
how to die.” That is, to understand the meaning of life the philosopher must
try to understand death and its meaning, or possibly its lack of meaning. And
for Mr. Critchley you cannot separate the spirit of philosophy from the body of
the philosopher. As he says, “The history of philosophy can be approached as a
history of philosophers that proceeds by examples remembered, often noble and
virtuous, but sometimes base and comical.” He adds, “The manner of the death of
philosophers humanizes them and shows that, despite the lofty reach of their
intellect, they have to cope with the hand life deals them like the rest of
us.”
As
a result, Mr. Critchley, philosophy chairman at the New School for Social
Research, has made a book out of marvelous and funny anecdotes about the deaths
of some 190 philosophers, from ancient to modern. Don’t be daunted by the many
centuries involved. And you don’t have to read the book all at once, Mr.
Critchley advises. You can just dip in and out of it at your pleasure.
Fortunately this reviewer was obligated to read it all. And, as the philosopher
would say, it was all for the good.
Thus,
we have Diogenes, who disdained fleshly pleasures and was said by some to have
committed suicide by holding his breath; Julien Offray de La Mettrie, atheist and
hedonist, who died after eating large amounts of truffled pâté; and Ludwig
Wittgenstein, who saw life and death as part of the same timelessness. He died
the day after his birthday. A friend had given him an electric blanket as a
present. “Many happy returns,” the friend said. “There will be no returns,”
Wittgenstein supposedly replied.
Mr.
Critchley recounts that Voltaire, after decades of denouncing the Roman
Catholic Church, announced on his deathbed that he wanted to die a Catholic.
But the shocked parish priest kept asking him, “Do you believe in the divinity
of Christ?” Voltaire begged, “In the name of God, Monsieur, don’t speak to me
any more of that man and let me die in peace.”
Hegel,
who, as much as any philosopher, Mr. Critchley says, saw philosophy as an
abstraction, while he was dying of cholera, moaned, “Only one man ever
understood me ... and he didn’t understand me.”
On
its surface this is a lighthearted book. Mr. Critchley is listed as head
philosopher of the International Necronautical Society, an avant-garde group
whose Web page (necronauts.org) says its central tenet is “inauthenticity” and
its purpose is devotion to the study of death, a “space which we intend to map,
colonize and eventually inhabit.” But Mr. Critchley has a serious side and is
author of learned works like “Infinitely Demanding: Ethics of Commitment,
Politics of Resistance,” “The Ethics of Deconstruction” and
“Ethics-Politics-Subjectivity.” He is at ease playing in the fields of
intentionality, categorical intuition and the phenomenological concept of the a
priori. This book has a 13-page scholarly bibliography.
In
Mr. Critchley’s serious view Western philosophy is wrongly seen as having been
derived mainly from the Greeks. Not true, he says, pointing to its origins
among Arabs, Persians, Chinese, Indians and others. Philosophy, he says, has
abandoned its original purpose, which is to give us wisdom and help us achieve
happiness. The development of philosophy, he writes, has been a process of
“westering” or “bestering.” Philosophy has tried to mimic science in its
constant striving toward the perfection of ideas and its quest for absolute
truth. Gradually philosophy has been abstracted from the concerns of everyday
life, leaving us in the grip of the “terror of annihilation.” To calm us, Mr.
Critchley says, there are endless sophistries for sale, New Age nostrums,
self-help books and the “mindless accumulation of money and possessions.”
All
well and good. But dare we amateurs question Mr. Critchley’s organizing
principle, that we can find that wisdom we are missing in the deaths of
philosophers? Kant died of a stomach ailment. What does that say about “The
Critique of Pure Reason”? His last words were apparently spoken after his
disciple gave him a little water mixed with wine. “Sufficit,” said Kant. (“It
is enough.”) But was Kant saying that he had lived sufficiently long to refine
his theories on metaphysics and epistemology? Or that he simply didn’t
want any more water?
Some
philosophers Mr. Critchley cites may not even have existed. “Let’s not allow
Pythagoras’s mere nonexistence to deter us, as the stories that surround him
are so compelling,” he suggests at one point, before telling us the legend that
Pythagoras died because he refused to cross a field of beans to escape his
enemies.
Mr.
Critchley himself points out that there are also philosophers in the book whose
deaths he doesn’t describe or whose last words are missing. There are also
sections in which he makes no attempt to connect the philosopher’s death to his
ideas.
Never
mind. Many deeds and utterances attributed to philosophers are apocryphal or
compiled posthumously by disciples. It’s a long tradition. Philosophical
writing is in its essence metaphorical.
This
book is just fun to read. You do learn a lot, including the way in which the
wise Mr. Critchley envisions the manner of his own death.
“Exit,”
Mr. Critchley says, “pursued by a bear.”
www.nytimes.com
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário